Re: [boost] Re: [thread] again

reHello, Unfortunately I don't have the time to reverse ingneer the boost_dev thread code. So maybye Michael Glassford can help me and answer the following questions. The most fundamental problem I found in boost thread is the functor copy. So is this still present in the new thread API ? Will the start&run thread API model be available in the new boost thread package ? If not, why ? -- Bien cordialement, Ch. Meessen

"Christophe Meessen" <christophe@meessen.net> wrote in message news:4084E416.7060706@meessen.net...
reHello,
Unfortunately I don't have the time to reverse ingneer the boost_dev thread code. So maybye Michael Glassford can help me and answer the following questions.
The most fundamental problem I found in boost thread is the functor copy. So is this still present in the new thread API ?
Will the start&run thread API model be available in the new boost
At this point, yes it is still present. thread
package ? If not, why ?
It's not so far. Why? I can only guess since I'm not the original author of the code, but 1) as far as I know, no one has asked for it until now; 2) as pointed out in replies to your message yesterday, it seems that most of what you want from the start & run model can also be accomplished with the Boost.Thread model. If you disagree, could you respond to those replies and explain why? Thanks, Mike
participants (2)
-
Christophe Meessen
-
Michael Glassford