Re: [boost] date_time: local_date_time small fix

2. Base class already has those operators, so why do you hide them?
Unless I'm missing something the base class provides for comparison to other local times not ptimes:
local_date_time l_time1(...), l_time2(...); if (ltime_1 == ltime_2) {...
1. template<class utc_time_=posix_time::ptime, class tz_type=date_time::time_zone_base<utc_time_> > class local_date_time_base : public date_time::base_time<utc_time_, boost::posix_time::posix_time_system> { 2. template <class T, class time_system> class base_time : private boost::less_than_comparable<T , boost::equality_comparable<T > > { public: typedef T time_type; //!Equality operator -- others generated by boost::equality_comparable bool operator==(const time_type& rhs) const { return time_system::is_equal(time_,rhs.time_); } As you can see date_time::base_time<utc_time_, boost::posix_time::posix_time_system> do provides comparison operator for ptime.
Jeff
Roman Yakovenko
participants (1)
-
Roman Yakovenko