Hi Brian, thank you for looking at my library :) 2010/3/7 Brian Wood <woodbrian77@gmail.com>:

Joachim Faulhaber writes:

...

Let me put it this way: std::set  : could be model of itl::Set, if operators were implemented itl::set : is model of itl::Set itl::interval_set : is model of itl::Set but implemented via intervals boost::dynamic_bitset : is almost model of itl::Set but implemented via arrays of machine words.

Joachim and I have previously discussed the names of some of the classes in his library in the context of serialization: *http://preview.tinyurl.com/y86phqg*

I don't have plans yet to add support for this library to the C++ Middleware Writer, but I would suggest that you consider where you will be able to come up with serialization support for the library.   I believe your options will be to add it yourself with Boost Serialization or go without it.

Offering serialization support will definitely be a useful addition for my library. Implementing serialization support via Boost.Serialization has been suggested among other things by John Reid and, although there are issues with higher priority, I am considering to integrate this.

If you stick with the names of some of the classes that you have today, at the very least, I'll put off developing marshalling support for the library.

To give you a little feed back: The sentence above didn't exactly make me feel in peace with you ;-/ But I'm open for your suggestions. Cheers, Joachim. P.S.: I liked the proverb that you quoted in another posting: "When a man's ways please the L-RD, he makes even his enemies to be at peace with him." Proverbs 16:7