Boost release 1.55.0 beta 1 is now available from SourceForge See http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.55.0.beta.1/ This release contains 1 new library: * Predef: This library defines a set of compiler, architecture, operating system, library, and other version numbers from the information it can gather of C, C++, Objective C, and Objective C++ predefined macros or those defined in generally available headers, from Rene Rivera. For details of what's in the release, see http://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_55_0.html. Note that the links to files on this web page are for the final release - use the SourceForge link above to get the beta files. Please download the beta, give it a try, and report any problems you encounter. Thanks, -- The Boost Release Team
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Marshall Clow <mclow.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
Boost release 1.55.0 beta 1 is now available from SourceForge
See http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.55.0.beta.1/
This release contains 1 new library:
* Predef: This library defines a set of compiler, architecture, operating system, library, and other version numbers from the information it can gather of C, C++, Objective C, and Objective C++ predefined macros or those defined in generally available headers, from Rene Rivera.
For details of what's in the release, see http://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_55_0.html. Note that the links to files on this web page are for the final release - use the SourceForge link above to get the beta files.
Please download the beta, give it a try, and report any problems you encounter.
Thanks,
-- The Boost Release Team
The corresponding windows binaries for msvc-8.0, msvc-9.0, msvc-10.0, and msvc-11.0 in 32 & 64 bit versions are now also available from sourceforge. https://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost-binaries/1.55.0_beta1/
I'm seeing that Fusion has not been updated with fixes for #5010<https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/5010#comment:24>a *3* *year old(!)* bug, that is reported as fixed. Why is this? From what I can tell, changeset #4441 <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/84441>fixes the issues I ran into, but the 1.55beta package doesn't reflect this... On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Tom Kent <lists@teeks99.com> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Marshall Clow <mclow.lists@gmail.com>wrote:
Boost release 1.55.0 beta 1 is now available from SourceForge
See http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.55.0.beta.1/
This release contains 1 new library:
* Predef: This library defines a set of compiler, architecture, operating system, library, and other version numbers from the information it can gather of C, C++, Objective C, and Objective C++ predefined macros or those defined in generally available headers, from Rene Rivera.
For details of what's in the release, see http://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_55_0.html. Note that the links to files on this web page are for the final release - use the SourceForge link above to get the beta files.
Please download the beta, give it a try, and report any problems you encounter.
Thanks,
-- The Boost Release Team
The corresponding windows binaries for msvc-8.0, msvc-9.0, msvc-10.0, and msvc-11.0 in 32 & 64 bit versions are now also available from sourceforge.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost-binaries/1.55.0_beta1/
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
On 10/8/2013 4:12 PM, Rich E wrote:
I'm seeing that Fusion has not been updated with fixes for #5010 <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/5010#comment:24> a /3/ /year old(!)/ bug, that is reported as fixed. Why is this? From what I can tell, changeset #4441 <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/84441> fixes the issues I ran into, but the 1.55beta package doesn't reflect this...
You'll have better results resending this with a more appropriate subject line, including "[fusion]". -- Eric Niebler Boost.org http://www.boost.org
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Eric Niebler <eniebler@boost.org> wrote:
You'll have better results resending this with a more appropriate subject line, including "[fusion]".
It's about this release, and how disconnected maintainers have become from new releases. Anyways, this bug reaches everything that touches boost fusion, which is unfortunately and confusingly quite alot. I've brought this silly nil problem up so many times that its just frustrating at this point.
On 10/10/13 4:56 AM, Rich E wrote:
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Eric Niebler <eniebler@boost.org> wrote:
You'll have better results resending this with a more appropriate subject line, including "[fusion]".
It's about this release, and how disconnected maintainers have become from new releases. Anyways, this bug reaches everything that touches boost fusion, which is unfortunately and confusingly quite alot.
I don't know about you, but I just checked the beta and I see nil_ (with the underscore). See boost/fusion/container/list/cons.hpp
I've brought this silly nil problem up so many times that its just frustrating at this point.
This is silly and nauseating indeed. Again and again, I say it's not fusion's fault. nil *IS* a perfectly valid C++ identifier. Still, I gave in to *YOUR* demands for reasons that I do not really care about. Now can people stop whining please? If you still see problems, please provide a patch. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.ciere.com http://boost-spirit.com http://www.cycfi.com/
On 10 October 2013 01:12, Joel de Guzman <djowel@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't know about you, but I just checked the beta and I see nil_ (with the underscore). See boost/fusion/container/list/cons.hpp
Unfortunately, Objective C also uses Nil. It seems that it has 4 different null pointers. There's a workaround in trunk in the changeset that was mentioned: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/84441
On 10/10/13 8:26 AM, Daniel James wrote:
On 10 October 2013 01:12, Joel de Guzman <djowel@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't know about you, but I just checked the beta and I see nil_ (with the underscore). See boost/fusion/container/list/cons.hpp
Unfortunately, Objective C also uses Nil. It seems that it has 4 different null pointers. There's a workaround in trunk in the changeset that was mentioned: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/84441
Alright. If the release managers will allow, I'll merge this changeset to release then. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.ciere.com http://boost-spirit.com http://www.cycfi.com/
Joel de Guzman <djowel@gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/10/13 8:26 AM, Daniel James wrote:
On 10 October 2013 01:12, Joel de Guzman <djowel@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't know about you, but I just checked the beta and I see nil_ (with the underscore). See boost/fusion/container/list/cons.hpp
Unfortunately, Objective C also uses Nil. It seems that it has 4 different null pointers. There's a workaround in trunk in the changeset that was mentioned: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/84441
Alright. If the release managers will allow, I'll merge this changeset to release then.
Sure, it's fine.
On 10/10/13 9:12 AM, Daniel James wrote:
Joel de Guzman <djowel@gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/10/13 8:26 AM, Daniel James wrote:
On 10 October 2013 01:12, Joel de Guzman <djowel@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't know about you, but I just checked the beta and I see nil_ (with the underscore). See boost/fusion/container/list/cons.hpp
Unfortunately, Objective C also uses Nil. It seems that it has 4 different null pointers. There's a workaround in trunk in the changeset that was mentioned: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/84441
Alright. If the release managers will allow, I'll merge this changeset to release then.
Sure, it's fine.
Done. To Rich E and all those who need the Nil/nil patch, please check the release branch now to make sure all is OK. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.ciere.com http://boost-spirit.com http://www.cycfi.com/
That looks like the change I was after, thank you. Let's just hope no others creep up... believe me I wish apple didn't make that move just as much as you do, but what can one do when writing cross-platform software. cheers, Rich On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Joel de Guzman <djowel@gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/10/13 9:12 AM, Daniel James wrote:
Joel de Guzman <djowel@gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/10/13 8:26 AM, Daniel James wrote:
On 10 October 2013 01:12, Joel de Guzman <djowel@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't know about you, but I just checked the beta and I see nil_ (with the underscore). See boost/fusion/container/list/**cons.hpp
Unfortunately, Objective C also uses Nil. It seems that it has 4 different null pointers. There's a workaround in trunk in the changeset that was mentioned: https://svn.boost.org/trac/**boost/changeset/84441<https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/84441>
Alright. If the release managers will allow, I'll merge this changeset to release then.
Sure, it's fine.
Done. To Rich E and all those who need the Nil/nil patch, please check the release branch now to make sure all is OK.
Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.ciere.com http://boost-spirit.com http://www.cycfi.com/
______________________________**_________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/** mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost<http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost>
On 10/12/13 11:45 AM, Rich E wrote:
That looks like the change I was after, thank you. Let's just hope no others creep up... believe me I wish apple didn't make that move just as much as you do, but what can one do when writing cross-platform software.
I think you mean cross-language ;-) Spirit is cross-platform as far as straight C++ is concerned. Thanks for checking. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.ciere.com http://boost-spirit.com http://www.cycfi.com/
participants (6)
-
Daniel James -
Eric Niebler -
Joel de Guzman -
Marshall Clow -
Rich E -
Tom Kent