[Serialization] Thread-safety again

Sorry for the double post. I misspelled "serialization" in the subject --- I posted this about a year ago but got no definite answer from Robert. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/132838/focus=132838 I vaguely remember that there were similar discussions about this issue a few month back but do not know if it had reached any conclusion. Now my programs started crashing because of this problem and I am wondering if there is a good solution. Is making the function scope static objects static member with its caveats the best we could do? Thanks, Sean

I've made changes in the code checked in to the HEAD of the CVS tree to address this. I think they address the issue but I don't have a real test though. Robert Ramey Sean Huang wrote:
Sorry for the double post. I misspelled "serialization" in the subject ---
I posted this about a year ago but got no definite answer from Robert. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/132838/focus=132838 I vaguely remember that there were similar discussions about this issue a few month back but do not know if it had reached any conclusion. Now my programs started crashing because of this problem and I am wondering if there is a good solution. Is making the function scope static objects static member with its caveats the best we could do?
Thanks,
Sean
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
participants (2)
-
Robert Ramey
-
Sean Huang