RE: [boost] Re: FC++ formal review

2 Mar
2004
2 Mar
'04
5:11 p.m.
I never question usefulness of function object (any-morphic). What I do seek is an example of lazy list application.
Then you should say so. "FP has no advantages" is a far cry from "Lazy lists have no advantages".
I actually "cry" "FC++ has no advantages". Take lazy list out of FC++, what we you be left with? Polymorphic function objects? I was agree from the very beginning it should be incorporated. Maybe though not as part of FC++, but boost::function and boost::functional Gennadiy.
7772
Age (days ago)
7772
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Rozental, Gennadiy