Hello, Is Boost.Log expected to enter one the Boost version soon? I see that its last update on sourceforge took place about a year ago... Thanks.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Igor R <boost.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
Is Boost.Log expected to enter one the Boost version soon? I see that its last update on sourceforge took place about a year ago...
Don't rely on the documentation date, it's wrong. The documentation wasn't updated at all since first publication. The last update on the bleeding-edge (litterally) branch was last saturday on the svn repository (on sourceforge). The trunk version is stable (I'm using it) but the whole work related to changes necessary before the mini-review before inclusion into boost are on the bleeding-edge branch. I don't know if Andrei finished the work, but as the last change was recent, I suppose it's not finished. Joel Lamotte
On Tuesday 11 September 2012 13:59:48 Klaim - Joël Lamotte wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Igor R <boost.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
Is Boost.Log expected to enter one the Boost version soon? I see that its last update on sourceforge took place about a year ago...
Don't rely on the documentation date, it's wrong. The documentation wasn't updated at all since first publication. The last update on the bleeding-edge (litterally) branch was last saturday on the svn repository (on sourceforge).
The trunk version is stable (I'm using it) but the whole work related to changes necessary before the mini-review before inclusion into boost are on the bleeding-edge branch. I don't know if Andrei finished the work, but as the last change was recent, I suppose it's not finished.
That's quite right, the work is not finished yet although I'm getting close. As soon as I'm done with Phoenix-based template expressions, I'll merge bleeding-edge to trunk. Then only minor code updates will be left + major docs update.
participants (3)
-
Andrey Semashev -
Igor R -
Klaim - Joël Lamotte