[python] [1.45] select_holder test failing
Dave, The python "select_holder" test is failing across a large number of platforms on the release branch including all clang and gcc compilers. Can you please look into this prior to 1.45? Thanks, -- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Ping? On 11/7/2010 5:17 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
Dave,
The python "select_holder" test is failing across a large number of platforms on the release branch including all clang and gcc compilers. Can you please look into this prior to 1.45?
This is now ticket https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/4829 -- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
At Tue, 09 Nov 2010 19:28:04 -0500, Eric Niebler wrote:
Ping?
On 11/7/2010 5:17 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
Dave,
The python "select_holder" test is failing across a large number of platforms on the release branch including all clang and gcc compilers. Can you please look into this prior to 1.45?
This is now ticket https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/4829
Sorry, been drowning in other work. I'll take a look at it today. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Hi Eric, I've fixed this on the trunk (svn rev. 66066). Let me know if you want me to merge the fix into the release branch. Ralf ----- Original Message ----
From: Eric Niebler <eric@boostpro.com> To: boost@lists.boost.org; David Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com> Sent: Tue, November 9, 2010 4:28:04 PM Subject: Re: [boost] [python] [1.45] select_holder test failing
Ping?
On 11/7/2010 5:17 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
Dave,
The python "select_holder" test is failing across a large number of platforms on the release branch including all clang and gcc compilers. Can you please look into this prior to 1.45?
This is now ticket https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/4829
-- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
(Please don't top-post. Re-arranging ...) On 11/15/2010 6:22 PM, Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote:
On November 9, 2010 4:28:04 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
On 11/7/2010 5:17 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
Dave,
The python "select_holder" test is failing across a large number of platforms on the release branch including all clang and gcc compilers. Can you please look into this prior to 1.45?
This is now ticket https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/4829
Hi Eric, I've fixed this on the trunk (svn rev. 66066). Let me know if you want me to merge the fix into the release branch. Ralf
The revision you mention (https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/66066) does not point to a commit to trunk. The release branch is closed to all but showstopper bugs. Ticket #4829 is not a showstopper, so any fix will not be taken, unless someone makes a case for promoting #4829 to showstopper priority. -- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Eric Niebler <eric@boostpro.com> wrote:
(Please don't top-post. Re-arranging ...)
On 11/15/2010 6:22 PM, Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote:
On November 9, 2010 4:28:04 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
On 11/7/2010 5:17 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
Dave,
The python "select_holder" test is failing across a large number of platforms on the release branch including all clang and gcc compilers. Can you please look into this prior to 1.45?
This is now ticket https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/4829
Hi Eric, I've fixed this on the trunk (svn rev. 66066). Let me know if you want me to merge the fix into the release branch. Ralf
The revision you mention (https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/66066) does not point to a commit to trunk.
The release branch is closed to all but showstopper bugs. Ticket #4829 is not a showstopper, so any fix will not be taken, unless someone makes a case for promoting #4829 to showstopper priority.
Well, it looks like that revision actually hit the release branch, so it's going to be up to you whether or not to roll it back. Ralf, thanks for your efforts! There are other regressions in there I plan to tackle. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
On 11/15/2010 7:42 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Eric Niebler <eric@boostpro.com> wrote:
(Please don't top-post. Re-arranging ...)
On 11/15/2010 6:22 PM, Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote:
On November 9, 2010 4:28:04 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
On 11/7/2010 5:17 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
Dave,
The python "select_holder" test is failing across a large number of platforms on the release branch including all clang and gcc compilers. Can you please look into this prior to 1.45?
This is now ticket https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/4829
Hi Eric, I've fixed this on the trunk (svn rev. 66066). Let me know if you want me to merge the fix into the release branch. Ralf
The revision you mention (https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/66066) does not point to a commit to trunk.
The release branch is closed to all but showstopper bugs. Ticket #4829 is not a showstopper, so any fix will not be taken, unless someone makes a case for promoting #4829 to showstopper priority.
Well, it looks like that revision actually hit the release branch, so it's going to be up to you whether or not to roll it back.
[66066] was committed to release a month ago, before the branch was frozen. It also hasn't fixed the test in question. Ralf, did you mean [66606]? If getting these tests to pass is as simple as adding a few missing include statements, I might consider taking this fix. It's extremely low-risk.
Ralf, thanks for your efforts! There are other regressions in there I plan to tackle.
Seconded. Thanks, -- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
On 11/15/2010 9:03 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
Ralf, did you mean [66606]? If getting these tests to pass is as simple as adding a few missing include statements, I might consider taking this fix. It's extremely low-risk.
I confirmed that that's the case and went ahead and merged [66606] to the release branch. Thanks, -- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Eric Niebler <eric@boostpro.com> wrote:
On 11/15/2010 9:03 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
Ralf, did you mean [66606]? If getting these tests to pass is as simple as adding a few missing include statements, I might consider taking this fix. It's extremely low-risk.
I confirmed that that's the case and went ahead and merged [66606] to the release branch.
Thanks, Eric!
--Beman
participants (5)
-
Beman Dawes -
Dave Abrahams -
David Abrahams
-
Eric Niebler -
Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve