On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:08 PM, news.gmane.org wrote:

Class iterator_facade has been refactored in v1.57 such that most of its functionality is now in iterator_facade_base. This includes the typedefs for difference_type and reference. Hence, my classes which are derived from iterator_facade now have to declare them. For example:

template class char_iter : public boost::iterators::iterator_facade< char_iter, Value,

boost::iterators::random_access_traversal_tag, Value, Size > { public: typedef typename iterator_facade_::difference_type difference_type; typedef typename iterator_facade_::reference reference; ... };

Have I misunderstood how to do this?

Your class is a template, and iterator_facade specialization depends on the template parameters. The compiler does not bind names from the iterator_facade base class (because it doesn't know which specialization will be taken), so you must explicitly qualify the base class name or declare the convenience typedefs like above. By doing so you make the type names dependent on the template parameters, postponing name binding to the template instantiation stage. This is also true for the iterator_facade_ typedef, as well as other members of iterator_facade, BTW. This behavior is standard C++, and 1.57 didn't bring anything new in this respect. Some compilers do not perform name binding properly, effectively delaying all of it to the template instantiation point. This is not a conforming behavior, and it can let errors like this pass unnoticed.

Thanks for the clarification. "Andrey Semashev" wrote in message news:CAEhD+6D7xRSZi0dQXwfFwM3h7ofgoOH5yjfa_0VeHRjAGYTHMg@mail.gmail.com... On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:08 PM, news.gmane.org wrote:

Class iterator_facade has been refactored in v1.57 such that most of its functionality is now in iterator_facade_base. This includes the typedefs for difference_type and reference. Hence, my classes which are derived from iterator_facade now have to declare them. For example:

template class char_iter : public boost::iterators::iterator_facade< char_iter, Value,

boost::iterators::random_access_traversal_tag, Value, Size > { public: typedef typename iterator_facade_::difference_type difference_type; typedef typename iterator_facade_::reference reference; ... };

Have I misunderstood how to do this?

Your class is a template, and iterator_facade specialization depends on the template parameters. The compiler does not bind names from the iterator_facade base class (because it doesn't know which specialization will be taken), so you must explicitly qualify the base class name or declare the convenience typedefs like above. By doing so you make the type names dependent on the template parameters, postponing name binding to the template instantiation stage. This is also true for the iterator_facade_ typedef, as well as other members of iterator_facade, BTW. This behavior is standard C++, and 1.57 didn't bring anything new in this respect. Some compilers do not perform name binding properly, effectively delaying all of it to the template instantiation point. This is not a conforming behavior, and it can let errors like this pass unnoticed. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost