a release manager for Boost 1.56
Hi, According to Boost calendar at http://www.boost.org/community/index.html, Master is open for bug fixes and doc changes. Can I thus merge this pull request: https://github.com/boostorg/optional/pull/6, which I consider a fix for a performance bug, but I anticipate other people may have other opinions? Regards, &rzej
On 7/15/2014 1:41 AM, Andrzej Krzemienski wrote:
Hi, According to Boost calendar at http://www.boost.org/community/index.html, Master is open for bug fixes and doc changes.
Hrm, we're still trying to get out a beta. I think that calendar is wrong.
Can I thus merge this pull request: https://github.com/boostorg/optional/pull/6, which I consider a fix for a performance bug, but I anticipate other people may have other opinions?
If tests have cycled and they look good, please go ahead. -- Eric Niebler Boost.org http://www.boost.org
On 15 Jul 2014 at 22:02, Eric Niebler wrote:
Can I thus merge this pull request: https://github.com/boostorg/optional/pull/6, which I consider a fix for a performance bug, but I anticipate other people may have other opinions?
If tests have cycled and they look good, please go ahead.
I'll take that as approval for Boost.Thread to merge all its outstanding bug fixes to release so :) Niall -- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/
2014-07-16 7:02 GMT+02:00 Eric Niebler
On 7/15/2014 1:41 AM, Andrzej Krzemienski wrote:
Hi, According to Boost calendar at http://www.boost.org/community/index.html , Master is open for bug fixes and doc changes.
Hrm, we're still trying to get out a beta. I think that calendar is wrong.
Can I thus merge this pull request: https://github.com/boostorg/optional/pull/6, which I consider a fix for a performance bug, but I anticipate other people may have other opinions?
If tests have cycled and they look good, please go ahead.
Thanks, However, it looks like although my changes are in Master, they didn't get included in Beta 1 release. Is it enough to put my changes in master at this stage to get them included in 1.56 release? Or is there a release branch? Regards, &rzej
On Jul 21, 2014, at 12:49 AM, Andrzej Krzemienski
2014-07-16 7:02 GMT+02:00 Eric Niebler
: On 7/15/2014 1:41 AM, Andrzej Krzemienski wrote:
Hi, According to Boost calendar at http://www.boost.org/community/index.html , Master is open for bug fixes and doc changes.
Hrm, we're still trying to get out a beta. I think that calendar is wrong.
Can I thus merge this pull request: https://github.com/boostorg/optional/pull/6, which I consider a fix for a performance bug, but I anticipate other people may have other opinions?
If tests have cycled and they look good, please go ahead.
Thanks, However, it looks like although my changes are in Master, they didn't get included in Beta 1 release. Is it enough to put my changes in master at this stage to get them included in 1.56 release? Or is there a release branch?
Yes, it’s enough to put your changes in master. No, there isn’t a release branch. “master” is the release branch; it’s supposed to be ready to release all the time. — Marshall
Hi, Marshall Clow wrote On 21-7-2014 16:00:
On Jul 21, 2014, at 12:49 AM, Andrzej Krzemienski
wrote: 2014-07-16 7:02 GMT+02:00 Eric Niebler
: On 7/15/2014 1:41 AM, Andrzej Krzemienski wrote:
Hi, According to Boost calendar at http://www.boost.org/community/index.html , Master is open for bug fixes and doc changes. Hrm, we're still trying to get out a beta. I think that calendar is wrong.
Can I thus merge this pull request: https://github.com/boostorg/optional/pull/6, which I consider a fix for a performance bug, but I anticipate other people may have other opinions? If tests have cycled and they look good, please go ahead.
Thanks, However, it looks like although my changes are in Master, they didn't get included in Beta 1 release. Is it enough to put my changes in master at this stage to get them included in 1.56 release? Or is there a release branch? Yes, it’s enough to put your changes in master. No, there isn’t a release branch. “master” is the release branch; it’s supposed to be ready to release all the time.
According to the calendar the master branch closes today ("provisional"). Can someone tell us if that is really the case, because we have to merge then (we prepared it)? And, if it does not close today, when it then will be closed? All these dates are called provisional for 2 months now, but I don't have the impression the schedule is following the provisional dates... But they are the only dates published. Thanks, Barend
On Jul 21, 2014, at 12:15 PM, Barend Gehrels
Hi,
Marshall Clow wrote On 21-7-2014 16:00:
On Jul 21, 2014, at 12:49 AM, Andrzej Krzemienski
wrote: 2014-07-16 7:02 GMT+02:00 Eric Niebler
: On 7/15/2014 1:41 AM, Andrzej Krzemienski wrote:
Hi, According to Boost calendar at http://www.boost.org/community/index.html , Master is open for bug fixes and doc changes. Hrm, we're still trying to get out a beta. I think that calendar is wrong.
Can I thus merge this pull request: https://github.com/boostorg/optional/pull/6, which I consider a fix for a performance bug, but I anticipate other people may have other opinions? If tests have cycled and they look good, please go ahead.
Thanks, However, it looks like although my changes are in Master, they didn't get included in Beta 1 release. Is it enough to put my changes in master at this stage to get them included in 1.56 release? Or is there a release branch? Yes, it’s enough to put your changes in master. No, there isn’t a release branch. “master” is the release branch; it’s supposed to be ready to release all the time.
According to the calendar the master branch closes today ("provisional"). Can someone tell us if that is really the case, because we have to merge then (we prepared it)? And, if it does not close today, when it then will be closed? All these dates are called provisional for 2 months now, but I don't have the impression the schedule is following the provisional dates... But they are the only dates published.
It is not the case. We’re about a week or so behind the schedule; and we will announce here when the master branch closes. Thanks for checking. — Marshall
Marshall Clow wrote On 21-7-2014 23:39:
On Jul 21, 2014, at 12:15 PM, Barend Gehrels
wrote: Hi,
Marshall Clow wrote On 21-7-2014 16:00:
On Jul 21, 2014, at 12:49 AM, Andrzej Krzemienski
wrote: 2014-07-16 7:02 GMT+02:00 Eric Niebler
: On 7/15/2014 1:41 AM, Andrzej Krzemienski wrote:
Hi, According to Boost calendar at http://www.boost.org/community/index.html , Master is open for bug fixes and doc changes. Hrm, we're still trying to get out a beta. I think that calendar is wrong.
Can I thus merge this pull request: https://github.com/boostorg/optional/pull/6, which I consider a fix for a performance bug, but I anticipate other people may have other opinions? If tests have cycled and they look good, please go ahead.
Thanks, However, it looks like although my changes are in Master, they didn't get included in Beta 1 release. Is it enough to put my changes in master at this stage to get them included in 1.56 release? Or is there a release branch? Yes, it’s enough to put your changes in master. No, there isn’t a release branch. “master” is the release branch; it’s supposed to be ready to release all the time. According to the calendar the master branch closes today ("provisional"). Can someone tell us if that is really the case, because we have to merge then (we prepared it)? And, if it does not close today, when it then will be closed? All these dates are called provisional for 2 months now, but I don't have the impression the schedule is following the provisional dates... But they are the only dates published. It is not the case. We’re about a week or so behind the schedule; and we will announce here when the master branch closes.
Hi Marshall, Thanks for your quick reply! Regards, Barend
Marshall Clow
According to the calendar the master branch closes today ("provisional"). Can someone tell us if that is really the case [...]
It is not the case. We’re about a week or so behind the schedule; and we will announce here when the master branch closes.
Just to confirm: does that mean that changes commited to master before the closing notice comes will make it into Boost 1.56? Thank you Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica
On Jul 21, 2014, at 11:00 PM, Joaquin M Lopez Munoz
Marshall Clow
writes: According to the calendar the master branch closes today ("provisional"). Can someone tell us if that is really the case [...]
It is not the case. We’re about a week or so behind the schedule; and we will announce here when the master branch closes.
Just to confirm: does that mean that changes commited to master before the closing notice comes will make it into Boost 1.56?
Yes. — Marshall
participants (6)
-
Andrzej Krzemienski
-
Barend Gehrels
-
Eric Niebler
-
Joaquin M Lopez Munoz
-
Marshall Clow
-
Niall Douglas