Hi, On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 02:56 +0100, Pavel Vozenilek wrote:

"Jonathan Turkanis" wrote:

[snip]

...

I think the review should be extended. If you do so, I will commit to writing a review, even though I don't know much about FSMs.

I am also working on a review of the library and will submit it in a couple of days.

...

...

I have not read the FSM reviews yet, but unfortunately IMO even if all the reviews are very favorable there simply have not been enough yet to justify accepting a medium sized library. It looks to me like only four people other than you and Andreas have posted on FSM so far.

I agree.

Perhaps it could be interpreted: as the library reached mature state where everybody's happy enough.

No. I think that silence is probably better interpreted as apathy or I don't have enough time to review something of this size and do it justice. I would not like to see libraries adopted into boost by default when they have not received a decent review. Just my 2p worth.

I feel current model of reviews is not designed to deal with big libraries well.

I very much agree. /ikh