Fwd: Fwd: [review] Review of Outcome v2 (Fri-19-Jan to Sun-28-Jan, 2018)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: degski
Can you elaborate on your point? If I'm left alone I'll miss your point.
I was mostly just responding to your example (which you asked me to do), and how I would do that, without having to deal with exceptions and/or outcomes. But, the more general point is, which Spirit in this case does very well, is to deal with potential problems at the source, in an explicit (comprehensive) way, without propagation of errors or exceptions.
It's becoming confusing the more you go.
It's probably because I'm rowing against the tide here. degski
Thanks for the answer. It clears a lot to me.
2018-01-28 20:16 GMT-03:00 degski
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: degski
Date: 28 January 2018 at 17:11 Subject: Re: [boost] Fwd: [review] Review of Outcome v2 (Fri-19-Jan to Sun-28-Jan, 2018) To: Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira On 28 January 2018 at 16:44, Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira < vini.ipsmaker@gmail.com> wrote:
Can you elaborate on your point? If I'm left alone I'll miss your point.
I was mostly just responding to your example (which you asked me to do), and how I would do that, without having to deal with exceptions and/or outcomes. But, the more general point is, which Spirit in this case does very well, is to deal with potential problems at the source, in an explicit (comprehensive) way, without propagation of errors or exceptions.
It's becoming confusing the more you go.
It's probably because I'm rowing against the tide here.
degski
-- Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira https://vinipsmaker.github.io/
participants (2)
-
degski
-
Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira