2014-04-23 17:33 GMT+04:00 Paul A. Bristow <pbristow@hetp.u-net.com>: <...>

...

2. What is your evaluation of the implementation? OK.

Though I'm not enthusiastic about the name of namespace boost::typeind:: but I don't have any much better ideas. Perhaps someone else has?

Nor am I clear that this namespace bti helps the reader.

"Through all the examples, we'll assume that the following namespace alias is in effect:

namespace bti = boost::typeind;

"

IMO, the frequency of use of the namespace bti is probably so low that spelling it out is clearer, for example:

boost::typeind::type_id<T>().pretty_name() // human readable

Agreed: boost::typeindex would be more user friendly. It suggests to the reader which library to look for. Other notes will be also addressed. Thanks for the review! -- Best regards, Antony Polukhin