Hi, Object-based persistency/serialization libraries often require significant modifications to the code. Would Boost consider adding a process-level checkpointing library to boost? This is obviously not easily portable, so I understand this is a long shot. If it is relevant, we might contribute a package used by my team that support multiple Linux platforms. Thanks, Yair --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
on Sat Sep 24 2011, "Lifshitz, Yair" <yair.lifshitz-AT-intel.com> wrote:
Hi,
Object-based persistency/serialization libraries often require significant modifications to the code. Would Boost consider adding a process-level checkpointing library to boost?
This is obviously not easily portable, so I understand this is a long shot. If it is relevant, we might contribute a package used by my team that support multiple Linux platforms.
Can it, in principle, be ported to other known platforms? -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
On 9/24/2011 10:31 AM, Lifshitz, Yair wrote:
Hi,
Object-based persistency/serialization libraries often require significant modifications to the code. Would Boost consider adding a process-level checkpointing library to boost?
Why not explain what you mean by a "process-level checkpointing library" and then others can comment if they might find it useful ?
participants (3)
-
Dave Abrahams -
Edward Diener -
Lifshitz, Yair