Re: [boost] [IBD] Trac Syntax Coloring Subproject

On 7/17/07, Kai BrĂ¼ning <kai@granus.net> wrote:
(Positing this here because boost-docs@lists.sourceforge.net currently rejects my mails although subscribing did work.)
Something strange is happening in that list. Can someone take a look? Can we start thinking moving the boost-docs list outside sourceforge?
Hi,
Hello :)
after volunteering help on boost.dev, Glyn Matthews and Matias Capeletto suggested that I take a look at IBD.
I think the Trac Syntax Coloring project should be rather fast and simple for starters, so I like to give it a try.
Great!
Looking around, I found that Trac is going to switch to Pygments. (snip)
I agree with the use of Pygments.
Joel and Eric, your QuickBook doc (http://www.boost.org/doc/html/quickbook.html) seems to be incomplete. At least I am missing keywords like super, alpha or template.
You are reading Quickbook 1.3 docs.
Is there a complete syntax guide somewhere or should I look at the source as definitive references?
Here it is a Quickbook 1.4 docs online version: http://tinyurl.com/2r6nae Before you start hacking at it, please read: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/BoostKateSupport The idea is to make both syntax coloring similar. Download boost::hs, and look for the file: http://tinyurl.com/33nb7b It is an already working syntax higlighting for Kate: http://docs.kde.org/stable/en/kdebase/kate/highlight.html I think it may help you in your project. This is other thing you may want to check: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/QuickbookSourceStylesheetProject The colors are already similar to the quickbook kate support definition. Thanks for jumping in! We really need this kind of energy at IBD :) Please, be free to ask for anything you need. King regards Matias
participants (1)
-
Matias Capeletto