Re: [boost] hierarchy_tree container

Subject: Re: [boost] hierarchy_tree container On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Morgan Freeberg <mkfreeberg@hotmail.com> wrote:
I have the logic for this nicely separated into a header that seems to meet all the Boost coding guidelines, although I know a peer review process would likely yield helpful improvements that aren't immediately obvious to me. The doc file I prepared goes into much greater detail how this all works...would there be interest in looking into such a thing?
yes, can you share the doc url ?

Were you able to read the doc url? From: mkfreeberg@hotmail.com To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: RE: [boost] hierarchy_tree container Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 23:52:31 +0000
Subject: Re: [boost] hierarchy_tree container On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Morgan Freeberg <mkfreeberg@hotmail.com> wrote:
I have the logic for this nicely separated into a header that seems to meet all the Boost coding guidelines, although I know a peer review process would likely yield helpful improvements that aren't immediately obvious to me. The doc file I prepared goes into much greater detail how this all works...would there be interest in looking into such a thing?
yes, can you share the doc url ?

Yes, not clear how it compares to the many other libraries around. If you check the Boost mailing list there are at least 3 or 4 old threads that discuss this topic and old libraries. Also, at github there are half a dozen implementations. I have tested before these two, so you may want to check how your compares to them generic n-ary trees for C++ http://code.google.com/p/treetree https://github.com/erikerlandson/st_tree The st_tree library implements a C++ template tree container class for storing data in arbitrary tree structures. st_tree is short for “standard template tree,” and supports STL-compatible interfaces including iterators, allocators and standard STL container methods. On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Morgan Freeberg <mkfreeberg@hotmail.com> wrote:
Were you able to read the doc url?
From: mkfreeberg@hotmail.com To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: RE: [boost] hierarchy_tree container Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 23:52:31 +0000
Subject: Re: [boost] hierarchy_tree container On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Morgan Freeberg <mkfreeberg@hotmail.com> wrote:
I have the logic for this nicely separated into a header that seems to meet all the Boost coding guidelines, although I know a peer review process would likely yield helpful improvements that aren't immediately obvious to me. The doc file I prepared goes into much greater detail how this all works...would there be interest in looking into such a thing?
yes, can you share the doc url ?
http://www.peekinthewell.net/boostsub/hierarchy_tree/
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
participants (2)
-
Jose
-
Morgan Freeberg