[boost.assign] help with borland, sunpro & cw 8.3
Hi All, If anyone thinks these compilers are important to support in boost.assign, I will need your help to make these regressions run. Otherwise I will flag the errors as "expected failure". -Thorsten -- Thorsten Ottosen ---------------------------- www.dezide.com http://www.cs.aau.dk/index2.php?content=Research/mi www.boost.org www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/
On May 1, 2005, at 6:37 PM, Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
Hi All,
If anyone thinks these compilers are important to support in boost.assign, I will need your help to make these regressions run.
Otherwise I will flag the errors as "expected failure".
You can mark the entire library as "unusable" on those compilers if it isn't going to work and isn't likely to. Doug
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
If anyone thinks these compilers are important to support in boost.assign, I will need your help to make these regressions run.
CW is important to me.
Otherwise I will flag the errors as "expected failure".
I wouldn't just yet. I have most of the assign tests working for CW-8.3, well at least comparable to the rest of the compilers. The errors are really in the boost/io/ios_state.hpp, and Boost.Test trying to compensate. More on another post. -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org
Rene Rivera wrote:
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
If anyone thinks these compilers are important to support in boost.assign, I will need your help to make these regressions run.
CW is important to me.
Otherwise I will flag the errors as "expected failure".
I wouldn't just yet. I have most of the assign tests working for CW-8.3, well at least comparable to the rest of the compilers. The errors are really in the boost/io/ios_state.hpp, and Boost.Test trying to compensate. More on another post.
OK, more progress on this.. Down to only one test failing on CW-8.3, list_inserter. Which also fails on CW-9.4.. another const vs. non-const issue I think. -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org
Rene Rivera wrote:
Rene Rivera wrote:
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
If anyone thinks these compilers are important to support in boost.assign, I will need your help to make these regressions run.
CW is important to me.
Otherwise I will flag the errors as "expected failure".
I wouldn't just yet. I have most of the assign tests working for CW-8.3, well at least comparable to the rest of the compilers. The errors are really in the boost/io/ios_state.hpp, and Boost.Test trying to compensate. More on another post.
OK, more progress on this.. Down to only one test failing on CW-8.3, list_inserter. Which also fails on CW-9.4.. another const vs. non-const issue I think.
And it was. Now all boost.assign tests should pass for the CodeWarrior compilers, that is 8 and 9, and Windows vs. Mac. -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org
"Rene Rivera" <grafik.list@redshift-software.com> wrote in message news:427C5213.8040101@redshift-software.com... | > OK, more progress on this.. Down to only one test failing on CW-8.3, | > list_inserter. Which also fails on CW-9.4.. another const vs. non-const | > issue I think. | | And it was. Now all boost.assign tests should pass for the CodeWarrior | compilers, that is 8 and 9, and Windows vs. Mac. outstanding! Thanks -Thorsten
participants (3)
-
Douglas Gregor -
Rene Rivera -
Thorsten Ottosen