Hi, If you've missed it, there was a recent thread about using google analytics in offline copies of boost and the consensus was firmly against them. The gil documentation includes the google analytics javascript but doesn't seem to use it. So I assumed that their inclusion was a mistake and went ahead and removed them on trunk. I hope that wasn't presumptuous. But I did this on the generated documentation as I couldn't work out how it is generated. It'd useful to have some brief instructions and any necessary files. Ideally we should be able to generate them with boost build but a manual doxygen call is fine. thanks, Daniel
Daniel, Thank you so much for taking care of this. I was going to ask for help in updating the GIL documentation. If you would like to help further, I have the doxygen file that you need to regenerate the documentation. Would it be OK if I emailed this to you? You can feel free to check it in anywhere you feel it belongs. Thanks, Lubomir
-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Daniel James Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 2:32 PM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: [boost] [gil] Google analytics script tags
Hi,
If you've missed it, there was a recent thread about using google analytics in offline copies of boost and the consensus was firmly against them. The gil documentation includes the google analytics javascript but doesn't seem to use it. So I assumed that their inclusion was a mistake and went ahead and removed them on trunk. I hope that wasn't presumptuous.
But I did this on the generated documentation as I couldn't work out how it is generated. It'd useful to have some brief instructions and any necessary files. Ideally we should be able to generate them with boost build but a manual doxygen call is fine.
thanks,
Daniel _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
2009/4/29 Lubomir Bourdev <lbourdev@adobe.com>:
Thank you so much for taking care of this. I was going to ask for help in updating the GIL documentation. If you would like to help further, I have the doxygen file that you need to regenerate the documentation. Would it be OK if I emailed this to you? You can feel free to check it in anywhere you feel it belongs.
Sure, send me what you've got and I'll see what I can do.
2009/4/29 Daniel James <daniel_james@fmail.co.uk>:
2009/4/29 Lubomir Bourdev <lbourdev@adobe.com>:
Thank you so much for taking care of this. I was going to ask for help in updating the GIL documentation. If you would like to help further, I have the doxygen file that you need to regenerate the documentation. Would it be OK if I emailed this to you? You can feel free to check it in anywhere you feel it belongs.
Sure, send me what you've got and I'll see what I can do.
OK, I've checked it into trunk, made some changes and rebuilt the documentation. There are still a couple of problems: doxygen generates a few broken links which I don't know how to deal with and I also removed the 'file members' link as doxygen doesn't seem to generate that file (globals.html). The inspect report should reflect these changes from tomorrow (Sunday): http://boost.cowic.de/rc/inspect-trunk.html#gil Daniel
Qqqqqqaqzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzaa On 4/29/09, Daniel James <daniel_james@fmail.co.uk> wrote:
2009/4/29 Lubomir Bourdev <lbourdev@adobe.com>:
Thank you so much for taking care of this. I was going to ask for help in updating the GIL documentation. If you would like to help further, I have the doxygen file that you need to regenerate the documentation. Would it be OK if I emailed this to you? You can feel free to check it in anywhere you feel it belongs.
Sure, send me what you've got and I'll see what I can do. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
-- Sent from my mobile device
participants (3)
-
Daniel James -
Lubomir Bourdev -
Neil Groves