Re: [boost] [interprocess] submission

Dan Brown wrote:
Christian Holmquist wrote:
I have a question about submissions. I have an enhancement, not a fix, for boost::interprocess (win32 native mutex and condition variables as an alternative to emulation). Ok to just submit the zip or should I open a ticket first?
see: http://www.boost.org/community/policy.html#effective
i.e., include [Interprocess] in the email topic so maybe the maintainer will read it.
Helpful, thank you. Another question.
Not only is it helpful, it just might get you a useful answer to your query, which I'll leave to Ion. Consequently, I added it for you.
I may not be able to justify to my employer completing the work to the satisfaction of all tests. For example, I don't have a working win32 native implementation of sharable and sharable- upgradable mutexes (aka read-write locks, I believe). Is it worth submitting in such a state in hopes others might be able to contribute, or should I hold off until I have time implement these and get all tests working?
I suspect the answer will be that offering something, even if not everything, will be helpful. Nevertheless, you need Ion to respond. _____ Rob Stewart robert.stewart@sig.com Software Engineer using std::disclaimer; Dev Tools & Components Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com ________________________________ IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.

El 25/10/2011 21:44, Stewart, Robert escribió:
I may not be able to justify to my employer completing the work to the satisfaction of all tests. For example, I don't have a working win32 native implementation of sharable and sharable- upgradable mutexes (aka read-write locks, I believe). Is it worth submitting in such a state in hopes others might be able to contribute, or should I hold off until I have time implement these and get all tests working?
What does "enhancement" and "fix" mean? Sorry if I missed some previous discussion, can you show me the details? Native implementation has been a major issue with windows and all ideas are welcome, but I must say that the issue is quite complicated. PS: Yes, putting [interprocess] in the title helps a lot ;-)
participants (2)
-
Ion Gaztañaga
-
Stewart, Robert