[Bug Sprint] Ticket #2867 - Adding a get_expected_args member to format
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/2867 This ticket has a working patch + test attached. Should be merged and closed. -- ___________________________________________ Joel Falcou - Assistant Professor PARALL Team - LRI - Universite Paris Sud XI Tel : (+33)1 69 15 66 35
AMDG Joel Falcou wrote:
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/2867
This ticket has a working patch + test attached. Should be merged and closed.
I don't like the name. I would prefer expected_args(). basic_format already has str (not get_str) and exceptions (not get_exceptions). It has getloc, but there is no _. Altogether, I think that expected_args is more consistent. In Christ, Steven Watanabe
Steven Watanabe wrote:
I don't like the name. I would prefer expected_args(). basic_format already has str (not get_str) and exceptions (not get_exceptions). It has getloc, but there is no _. Altogether, I think that expected_args is more consistent. so I'll regenerate a patch file with :
expected_args() bound_args() remaining_args() as methods names and appropriate tests Shoudl this be ok then ? -- ___________________________________________ Joel Falcou - Assistant Professor PARALL Team - LRI - Universite Paris Sud XI Tel : (+33)1 69 15 66 35
participants (2)
-
Joel Falcou -
Steven Watanabe