On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 11:34:51AM -0400, David Abrahams wrote:

Domenico Andreoli <cavok@tiscali.it> writes:

...

hi,

i'm wondering whether boost/iterator/iterator_adaptor.hpp really needs to include boost/python/detail/is_xxx.hpp or not.

I *think* it does not.

...

it seems this inclusion is not required, removing it does not any harm.

i'm asking this because debian packages python headers in package libboost-python-dev and itarator headers in libboost-dev.

this (maybe useless) inclusion forces libboost-dev to depend on libboost-python-dev making it useless as separate package from libboost-dev.

i'd like to remove this inclusion, at least for what regards the debian packages. i'd be very glad to hear your thoughts about this story.

I'll remove it here; we can watch the nightly regression tests and see if anything breaks.

every day i'm amazed about Boost and its organization. only now i'm seeing the regression tests and all the information they produce. i need to study them a little. thanks for considering my request, i'm very eager to hear about results. cheers domenico -----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok --[ http://people.debian.org/~cavok/gpgkey.asc ---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50

"Aleksey Gurtovoy" <agurtovoy@meta-comm.com> writes:

David Abrahams writes:

...

I'll remove it here; we can watch the nightly regression tests and ^^^^^^^ see if anything breaks.

Nowadays, ours are run twice daily (a new cycle starting at 12:00 p.m. and 12:00 a.m. US Central Time).

Thanks, Aleksey. So far it looks like that change was OK, though of course it's a little hard to tell for sure because of other problems in the state of the codebase. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com