Even from my light boost.typeof experience, i know that this problem with MS precompiled headers is a show-stopper for comfortable boost.typeof usage. This is why I am actively vote for this fix. Best Regards, Sergey Bulygin "Arkadiy Vertleyb" <vertleyb@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<e174i9$8aj$1@sea.gmane.org>...

...

Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:

...

FWIW, I don't think we need this for typeof. All we need is to define some templates in, for example, <unnamed>::boost_typeof, and then refer to

"Tobias Schwinger" <tschwinger@neoscientists.org> wrote them

...

...

as boost_typeof::blah.

Hmmm... That's about what I was talking about.

Figuring that "boost_typeof" (other than "_mpl") is a name that's pretty unlikely to collide with user code, you probably won't need a configuration macro for its name.

...

No leading "::" is needed.

And (so joking doesn't obscure the message of my previous post) there is no "::" in the code! I used "::" simply to denote the namespace lives in the root namespace :-)...

So, we seem to be in total agreement :-)

My only concern was that this violates the Boost naming convention, but I think getting things to work is more important. Besides, you pointed to a precedent. I also know another one -- bind placeholders.

I will not be available next week, but after that, unless somebody suggests a better alternative, I will implement this (I hope CVS is stable at that point, and we are not yet in the code freeze).

Regards, Arkadiy

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost