Vladimir Prus-3 wrote

Some time ago we had a poll about formal reviews problems:

https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VladimirPrus/posts/5spgjicc3fv

The majority said that ten days are not enough. Of course, it's not very statistically significant, but that's the only data we've got, and we have a rather sparse schedule. How about trying two weeks for a formal review?

Note that there is no reason why anyone who wants to can't review a library in the incubator. In fact, for the "compute" library, there is already one review ready. People are free to read and comment on this review already. So we can say that the "real" as opposed to the "formal" review period extends from the time the library is submitted to the incubator to the time the formal review period ends - that's much, much longer than 10-14 days. Robert Ramey -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Duration-of-formal-reviews-tp4670095p4670... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

On 12/12/2014 11:24 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:

Some time ago we had a poll about formal reviews problems:

https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VladimirPrus/posts/5spgjicc3fv

The majority said that ten days are not enough. Of course, it's not very statistically significant, but that's the only data we've got, and we have a rather sparse schedule. How about trying two weeks for a formal review?

+1 In fact I can see review lasting another week, but I agree that two weeks should be minimum.