Sorry folks, my value for Clang and gcc 5.0.0 was wrong - it does report 50000 I had a fault in my configuration and it was dropping back to the default 4.6.3 John ________________________________________ From: Boost [boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] on behalf of Peter Dimov [lists@pdimov.com] Sent: 18 January 2015 18:54 To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] Clang 3.4 failing to compile boost 1.57 headers Fletcher, John P wrote:

Results are as follows for clang 3.5

gcc version gcc reports clang reports 4.6.3 40603 40700 4.8.2 40802 40800 4.9.0 40900 40900 4.9.2 40902 40900 5.0.0 50000 40700 <- actually 50000

I can see that there are some serious problems getting the correct identification with Clang.

Looks like unless it recognizes 4.8 or 4.9, it reports 40700 by default, which would make things a bit complicated. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost