Is that a April fools' joke? On 4/1/07, David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> wrote:

As of this morning, we're down to a single failure for 1.34, and that's just a tester configuration issue. Once Roland Schwartz configures his cygwin python, that test (and all the Boost.Python tests that have been marked expected failure on cygwin) will pass.

Just thought y'all would like to know.

-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com

Don't Miss BoostCon 2007! ==> http://www.boostcon.com

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

on Sun Apr 01 2007, David Abrahams <dave-AT-boost-consulting.com> wrote:

As of this morning, we're down to a single failure for 1.34, and that's just a tester configuration issue. Once Roland Schwartz configures his cygwin python, that test (and all the Boost.Python tests that have been marked expected failure on cygwin) will pass.

Just thought y'all would like to know.

And I just checked in what I hope are the final adjustments to BBv2 Python support: the ability to build against a --with-pydebug version of Python. Although our tests don't depend on it, that feature was available in BBv1 and the Python build documentation describes it, so it couldn't disappear. I tested it on a wide variety of platforms before checking it in, so hopefully nothing will break. If something goes wrong, it should be an easy fix (or rollback, if absolutely necessary). -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com Don't Miss BoostCon 2007! ==> http://www.boostcon.com