[serialization] utility.hpp lacks mpl/and.hpp include
The file boost\serialization\utility.hpp in the trunk lacks the following include directive: #include <boost/mpl/and.hpp> fix: #include <boost/serialization/is_bitwise_serializable.hpp> +#include <boost/mpl/and.hpp> namespace boost { Regards, -- Felipe Magno de Almeida
On 29 Dec 2007, at 04:56, Felipe Magno de Almeida wrote:
The file boost\serialization\utility.hpp in the trunk lacks the following include directive:
#include <boost/mpl/and.hpp>
fix:
#include <boost/serialization/is_bitwise_serializable.hpp> +#include <boost/mpl/and.hpp>
Thanks, it is committed to the trunk Matthias
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 07:49:47AM +0100, Matthias Troyer wrote:
On 29 Dec 2007, at 04:56, Felipe Magno de Almeida wrote:
The file boost\serialization\utility.hpp in the trunk lacks the following include directive:
#include <boost/mpl/and.hpp>
fix:
#include <boost/serialization/is_bitwise_serializable.hpp> +#include <boost/mpl/and.hpp>
Thanks, it is committed to the trunk
Oops, I have this change as well in my working copy together with some more. It seems I did not yet reported it? OK, I attached a further patch which fixes header inclusion even more. PS: Many maintainer are still ignoring my patches, probably that's the reason that I stopped sending further ones ... Jens
There might be some confusion here. At least I'm confused. When I get something like this, I add it to my local copy so its there for my next round of tests. If that doesn't trip up anything else - superfluous warnings or whatever, I commit it to the next release branch. I've been assuming that the 1.35 is "imminent" so I'm very reluctant to check in something that "can't cause any problems" because if it does (as often happens) its holds up the whole release for what is now dozen's of libraries. A better mechanism for these things is the TRAK database which ensures that these things are always there until addressed. There is even a "TRAK nannie" to bug people about getting after them. So don't think that just because you latest tweak doesn't show up immediatly in the trunk that it's not been addressed. Robert Ramey Jens Seidel wrote:
PS: Many maintainer are still ignoring my patches, probably that's the reason that I stopped sending further ones ...
Jens
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
participants (4)
-
Felipe Magno de Almeida -
Jens Seidel -
Matthias Troyer -
Robert Ramey