Re: [boost] [Boost-announce] [review][constrained_value] Review of Constrained Value Library begins today

On Dec 1, 2008, at 7:59 AM, Jeff Garland wrote:
Yes, please accept it.
- What is your evaluation of the design?
It's OK.
- What is your evaluation of the implementation?
Fine. I liked the attempts to minimize extra space per object. I didn't like that there were neither tests nor conventional examples. The file where the Quickbook docs took its code examples was the only *.cpp file provided. Fortunately, it's (intentionally) compilable.
- What is your evaluation of the documentation?
It's extensive, both the usage (Quickbook) and code (Doxygen) guides. On the usage guide, I don't think the tutorial's "ignore" type does what you think it does.
- What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library?
I find restrained types to be useful.
Yes, with Mac OS X 10.4 (PowerPC) using XCode. No problems.
- How much effort did you put into your evaluation? A glance? A quick reading? In-depth study?
A day of reading and trying out the examples.
- Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain?
Somewhat -- Daryle Walker Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie darylew AT hotmail DOT com

Hi Daryle,
From: Daryle Walker
On the usage guide, I don't think the tutorial's "ignore" type does what you think it does.
Could you please elaborate on this?
Thanks for your review. Best regards, Robert

On Dec 9, 2008, at 8:48 PM, Robert Kawulak wrote:
The "ignore" type's member function template seems to throw an exception upon detecting a violation, i.e. the default behavior. But isn't the point of this type to do nothing on violations? (Too much copy & paste?) -- Daryle Walker Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie darylew AT hotmail DOT com
participants (2)
-
Daryle Walker
-
Robert Kawulak