Misunderstandings about the Boost Foundation
Hi all, I want to address some misunderstandings surrounding Jon Kalb’s departure, foundation revenue sources, and boost project initiatives. First, Jon’s exit from the Boost Foundation was not the result of Jon committing a code of conduct violation. Out of respect for his privacy, I don’t want to detail the rationale unless Jon agrees that it should be public. Second, Boost Foundation revenue comes from sources beyond C++Now proceeds; individual donations and corporate matches make up 41% of revenue. Finally, I’d like to address the idea that the foundation board is distracted with the conference and pays no attention to the Boost project. A lot of what we do isn’t visible, so it is understandable how someone might come to this conclusion. However, here is a sample of Boost project-specific work we’ve done over the past couple of years: - Retired an old server that was no longer being used - Brought on a contractor who provided advice on how to migrate Wowbagger’s functionality off of legacy platforms - Handled outages due to Wowbagger’s hard drive failures - Addressed a GitHub issue where a large file was exceeding our limits - Created a discourse.boost.org so the Boost community could experiment with a mailing list alternative - Solicited estimates from CDN vendors when our current sponsor said they’d no longer be able to provide free bandwidth - Held brainstorming sessions on how we could help the Boost project better meet its objectives The fact that foundation work isn’t widely known by others involved in the Boost Project is a problem. I’d like to find more effective means to communicate the good work that’s being done. – David
El 13/08/2024 a las 2:43, David Sankel via Boost escribió:
Hi all, I want to address some misunderstandings surrounding Jon Kalb’s departure, foundation revenue sources, and boost project initiatives.
First, Jon’s exit from the Boost Foundation was not the result of Jon committing a code of conduct violation. Out of respect for his privacy, I don’t want to detail the rationale unless Jon agrees that it should be public.
I think the only public information we have from the Foundation is: (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zMKUX3nfdcOXT6nUIU4M_YRlCU4ywGoG40ouo3IK...) **** 2022-03-11 Meeting Discussed evidence that a board member Y was aware of X's felony conviction prior to C++Now 2021 where X was a speaker. Discussed that Y was also aware of the potential for scandal this could have. Concluded that Y’s failure to report this information to the Boost Foundation Board was a serious lapse in judgment that put the entire conference at risk. Considering Y was already transitioning out of their Boost and C++Now conference responsibilities, resolved to ask Y to accelerate that transition. 2022-03-11 Note On 2022-03-11, Person Y resigned from the board and from his C++Now positions. **** Best, Ion
participants (2)
-
David Sankel
-
Ion Gaztañaga