Hi all, Thanks to whomever cleaned up the old runs on this page: http://www.boost.org/development/tests/release/developer/summary.html I just wanted to ask: * what's the procedure here, are old runs cleaned up automatically? * Is there a preferred naming convention for the runs? We're aware of some issues with Boost.Build on 64-bit FreeBSD platforms at the moment. I'll be starting another run shortly, but will be performing it on i386, so as to avoid the FAILs we're seeing. I just merged a fix to FreeBSD's system gcc to deal with some issues in global 'using' declarations, that should bring FreeBSD-STABLE/i386 closer to the other platforms in terms of Boost stability. I would like to get a slice of FreeBSD cluster resources to run the Boost regression tests periodically, so I'll have a chat with the cluster admins about it. thanks, BMS
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Bruce Simpson<bms@incunabulum.net> wrote:
Hi all,
Thanks to whomever cleaned up the old runs on this page: http://www.boost.org/development/tests/release/developer/summary.html
I just wanted to ask: * what's the procedure here, are old runs cleaned up automatically?
No. I just manually delete them from the FTP site. If someone wanted to contribute a script (bash, python, or Windows cmd) that would delete files older than say 10 days old, I could add that to the regular daily processing that runs automatically on my machine.
* Is there a preferred naming convention for the runs?
I don't recall any, but you might want to ask on boost-testing@lists.boost.org Thanks, --Beman
participants (2)
-
Beman Dawes -
Bruce Simpson