[SoC] what do we do when we have multiple applicants for projects

Dear List and SoC interested, I have received emails from several people that would like to do my Associtive Container project. What should we try to do in that case? Should we ecourage them all to write the same library or should we try to make up similar projects? How do we decide on who gets to what if only one may do the project? Thanks -Thorsten

On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 08:47:31PM +0200, Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
I have received emails from several people that would like to do my Associtive Container project.
My mentorship is still pending according to Google, and my proposal is (unaltered) still on the wiki. I never received emails from students (I doubt they have my email address, even though it would be easy to find). Can someone tell me what will happen next? In case 'boost' decides not to want me as mentor-- I am interested to work on C++ projects outside of SoC and/or boost too; just don't expect to get paid in that case ;) (as neither will I; this is all open source / volunteer work). I suppose only students who can't get/find a SoC project might be interested -- or people who would like to do a project but aren't a student, heheh. -- Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>

My mentorship is still pending according to Google, and my proposal is (unaltered) still on the wiki. I never received emails from students (I doubt they have my email address, even though it would be easy to find). Can someone tell me what will happen next?
Submissions by students are now closed, and we have a breathing space while the current mentors rank applications etc. So far we've been deliberately very conservative in selecting mentors: in a large part because we don't know what we're doing yet (it's Boost's first year of participation remember). Also we want to try and limit the number of student projects requiring a full Boost-review during August, there's clearly a limit to how many we can cope with. However, we've had a lot of high quality applications, so it is possible we'll start looking for additional mentors at some point. Basically what I'm trying to say is: we're not ignoring you, we're just being cautious until we have a better handle on things. I hope this explains where we're at, Regards, John Maddock.
participants (3)
-
Carlo Wood
-
John Maddock
-
Thorsten Ottosen