Re: [boost] Formal Review: Indexed Set
Hi Jeff ----- Mensaje original ----- De: Jeff Garland <jeff@crystalclearsoftware.com> Fecha: Sábado, Marzo 27, 2004 4:55 pm Asunto: Re: [boost] Formal Review: Indexed Set
// why doesn't this work? //typedef nth_iterator_type<date_to_string_bimap,2>::type to_map_itr;
It is typedef nth_iterator_type<date_to_string_bimap,1>::type to_map_itr; Index numbering is 0-based. I think this is the only problem in the program. If you have further problems please tell me so. Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
// why doesn't this work? //typedef nth_iterator_type<date_to_string_bimap,2>::type to_map_itr;
It is
typedef nth_iterator_type<date_to_string_bimap,1>::type to_map_itr;
Index numbering is 0-based. I think this is the only problem in the program. If you have further problems please tell me so.
Yep, that was the problem, thx. Jeff
JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z <joaquin@tid.es> writes:
Hi Jeff
----- Mensaje original ----- De: Jeff Garland <jeff@crystalclearsoftware.com> Fecha: Sábado, Marzo 27, 2004 4:55 pm Asunto: Re: [boost] Formal Review: Indexed Set
// why doesn't this work? //typedef nth_iterator_type<date_to_string_bimap,2>::type to_map_itr;
It is
typedef nth_iterator_type<date_to_string_bimap,1>::type to_map_itr;
Index numbering is 0-based. I think this is the only problem in the program. If you have further problems please tell me so.
Not having looked at the proposal at all, I still think I should raise the usual concerns about "metafunctions" not accepting type parameters, which don't play nice with MPL and lambda expressions. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
participants (3)
-
David Abrahams -
Jeff Garland -
JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z