Guys, I know you are all very busy persons, probably even more busy than I am. :) But the situation with the review queue is getting really daunting. Boost.Log (as well as many other good libraries) is hanging in the queue for a quite long time, and it desperately needs a review manager. There has been a few active discussions of this particular library and logging in general, so I can't count this situation to a lack of interest to a logging library in Boost. Logging is not something domain-specific. I'm sure most of us have worked with a tool like this, so virtually anyone can manage this review. I'm asking someone to step forward and make this library a part of Boost, if it deserves so, or make it RIP otherwise. You will not be forgotten by thankful users and me. Thank you.
Andrey Semashev wrote:
Guys, I know you are all very busy persons, probably even more busy than I am. :) But the situation with the review queue is getting really daunting.
Boost.Log (as well as many other good libraries) is hanging in the queue for a quite long time, and it desperately needs a review manager. There has been a few active discussions of this particular library and logging in general, so I can't count this situation to a lack of interest to a logging library in Boost. Logging is not something domain-specific. I'm sure most of us have worked with a tool like this, so virtually anyone can manage this review.
I'm asking someone to step forward and make this library a part of Boost, if it deserves so, or make it RIP otherwise. You will not be forgotten by thankful users and me. Thank you.
I will be happy to be the review manager for this library, in case I qualify for this role. - Volodya
On 01/08/2010 06:13 PM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
Andrey Semashev wrote:
I'm asking someone to step forward and make this library a part of Boost, if it deserves so, or make it RIP otherwise. You will not be forgotten by thankful users and me. Thank you.
I will be happy to be the review manager for this library, in case I qualify for this role.
Of course you do. Thank you very much!
Andrey Semashev wrote:
On 01/08/2010 06:13 PM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
Andrey Semashev wrote:
I'm asking someone to step forward and make this library a part of Boost, if it deserves so, or make it RIP otherwise. You will not be forgotten by thankful users and me. Thank you.
I will be happy to be the review manager for this library, in case I qualify for this role.
Of course you do. Thank you very much!
Andrey, Actually, I think it is Ron and my job to decide if he qualifies. That said, of course he does. Thank you, Volodya. We'll update the schedule, and we look forward to hearing from you two when there is a date proposal for the review. John
On 01/09/2010 12:06 AM, John Phillips wrote:
I will be happy to be the review manager for this library, in case I qualify for this role.
Of course you do. Thank you very much!
Andrey,
Actually, I think it is Ron and my job to decide if he qualifies.
Sure. I was a bit too enthusiastic with finding Vladimir as a review manager. Just wanted to say that I'd be happy if he managed the review.
participants (3)
-
Andrey Semashev -
John Phillips -
Vladimir Prus