[parameter] ArgumentPack + macros
Whatever the final name of the concept is, shouldn't the template parameter type used by BOOST_PARAMETER_FUN and BOOST_PARAMETER_MEMFUN be called by this name? Cromwell D. Enage ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Cromwell Enage <sponage@yahoo.com> writes:
Whatever the final name of the concept is, shouldn't the template parameter type used by BOOST_PARAMETER_FUN and BOOST_PARAMETER_MEMFUN be called by this name?
I don't understand the question. Could you say, shouldn't it be XXXXXXXXXXXX instead of YYYYYYYYYYYY ?? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
--- David Abrahams wrote:
I don't understand the question. Could you say,
shouldn't it be
XXXXXXXXXXXX
instead of
YYYYYYYYYYYY
??
Currently, code using the macros looks like the following: BOOST_PARAMETER_FUN(...) { typedef typename boost::parameter::binding< Params // template parameter name , tag::foo_ >::type bar_; } For the sake of consistency, I was asking for the macros to be changed so that user code would look like the following: BOOST_PARAMETER_FUN(...) { typedef typename boost::parameter::binding< ArgumentPack // matches concept , tag::foo_ >::type bar_; } Cromwell D. Enage ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
participants (2)
-
Cromwell Enage -
David Abrahams