Re: [Boost-testing] Re: Intel 7.1-linux tarball results

Robert Ramey writes:
Isn't this a link from the 1.32 release package.
I'm sorry, but the question doesn't make sense to me. What _is_ "a link from the 1.32 release package"? For that matter, what's "1.32 release package"? We didn't release yet; we only have "final draft tarballs", and the link I posted points to the reports for those.
Can't the link just be left and point to the updated results?
Please be more specific: which link? left where?
In fact, isn't possible that a newer version of a compiler (e.g. gcc 3.4.3?) comes out and we want to re-run show updated test results eventhough the 1.32 package is frozen.
OK, I understand this one :). Yes, it's surely possible, and we can easily do that.
I don't see this has having anything to do with release drafts.
Depends what "this" is. The results at http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/boost-regression/developer/index.html most definitely report the status of the draft tarballs. -- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering
participants (1)
-
Aleksey Gurtovoy