RE: [boost] Re: Wave Bjam building problems\Joel de Guzman -didyoueverfind a solution?

-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of David Abrahams Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 8:48 AM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: [boost] Re: Wave Bjam building problems\Joel de Guzman - didyoueverfind a solution?
"Brian Braatz" <brianb@rmtg.com> writes:
Hartmut- HI THERE! I must say, I am excited to get the build fun over with so I can use your extremely cool creation.
Details: I am using V2. I am NOW much closer. I am compiling but NOT LINKING- I have removed VC70 COMPLETELY from my box
That was unneccessary. Sorry you did it.
and rebuilt boost with 71 (again). That an a using msvc : 7.1. : (path to cl.exe) in the user-config.jam got me to compile.
Additionally, I went through and manually removed all of the references in my LIB, INCLUDE and PATH to vc70.
Also unneccessary.
This may sound extreme, but it allowed BJAM to compile (Bjam's interaction with those ENV vars is something I don't fully know how it works)
It doesn't interact with them.
I am now trying to build the quick start with the VC71 IDE
My current problem is this link error: Linking... LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file 'libboost_wave-vc7-mt-gd-1_32.lib'
Build log was saved at
"file://c:\data\Irx\Irx\Arx\Main\Source\Common\Boost\V_1_32\libs\wave\sa
mples\quick_start\Debug\BuildLog.htm" WaveQuickStart - 1 error(s), 0 warning(s)
The LIB I have available is 'libboost_wave-vc71-mt-gd-1_32.lib not 'libboost_wave-vc7-mt-gd-1_32.lib'. I am not sure WHY the autolinking is trying to hit the vc70 version of the lib since I am using VC71's IDE.
(ANYONE HAVE ANY SUGGESTIONS?)
I don't know; this looks like a possible misuse of the autolink system by Wave, or... maybe you need to force-rebuild your entire vc71 project? If you have any object files lying around that were build with vc70 you'll have the incorrect autolink references in them.
[Brian Braatz Writes:] Thanks for the notes. I am trying to get Wave working because I have a theory it could be useful to me for an instrument tool I envision adding to the proposed profiler. I am traveling today, but over the weekend, I am going to play with this some more. I am thinking about rebuilding a separate machine, and starting over from scratch (just to remove any weirdness in config I have on my main laptop).
participants (1)
-
Brian Braatz