[1.47.0] Regression in type_traits, is it too late to revert?
There's a regression in type_traits caused by the addition of compiler-intrinsic support for Clang - this got reverted on Trunk after a flurry of discussion a while back: http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2011/06/182844.php. Unfortunately it appears it never got reverted on the release branch. Can we please revert this? Thanks, John.
On 6/24/2011 9:51 AM, John Maddock wrote:
There's a regression in type_traits caused by the addition of compiler-intrinsic support for Clang - this got reverted on Trunk after a flurry of discussion a while back: http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2011/06/182844.php. Unfortunately it appears it never got reverted on the release branch.
Can we please revert this?
If it's has been reverted on trunk and has not been causing problems there, then yes, please go ahead an revert. Please add "authorized by eric niebler" to the commit message. -- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
There's a regression in type_traits caused by the addition of compiler-intrinsic support for Clang - this got reverted on Trunk after a flurry of discussion a while back: http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2011/06/182844.php. Unfortunately it appears it never got reverted on the release branch.
Can we please revert this?
If it's has been reverted on trunk and has not been causing problems there, then yes, please go ahead an revert. Please add "authorized by eric niebler" to the commit message.
Done, thanks, John.
On 24/06/2011, John Maddock <boost.regex@virgin.net> wrote:
There's a regression in type_traits caused by the addition of compiler-intrinsic support for Clang - this got reverted on Trunk after a flurry of discussion a while back: http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2011/06/182844.php. Unfortunately it appears it never got reverted on the release branch.
I reverted it last night. I was going to wait a couple of days to check the test results.
participants (3)
-
Daniel James -
Eric Niebler -
John Maddock