Hello all, Recently I used both Boost.Lambda and Boost.Phoenix to implement lambda functions. Why does Boost have two libraries that implement lambda functions? In my (limited) experience, Boost.Phoenix is more powerful than Boost.Lambda (and it has comparable run-times even if it has larger compile-times) plus Boost.Phoenix can do much more than "just" lambdas. * Is there anything that Boost.Lambda can do more than Boost.Phoenix? * Is there any application domain where using Boost.Lambda makes more sense than using Boost.Phoenix? Thank you. --Lorenzo -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/boost-lambda-Diff-with-Boost-Phoenix-for-... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.