Stefan,
Is there a particular reason why ublas is marked unusable for cw 8.3?
Stefan
It used to give a lot of nasty template errors of the form: # 678: :, value_type> (), cm, e, row_major_tag ()); # Error: ^ # illegal template argument dependent expression I say 'used to' because the results are now hidden behind the grey 'n/a'. I doubt there is much that can be done however. If you have better information and the compiler we could take a look! Michael -- ___________________________________ Michael Stevens Systems Engineering Navigation Systems, Estimation and Bayesian Filtering http://bayesclasses.sf.net ___________________________________
Michael Stevens wrote:
It used to give a lot of nasty template errors of the form: # 678: :, value_type> (), cm, e, row_major_tag ()); # Error: ^ # illegal template argument dependent expression
I say 'used to' because the results are now hidden behind the grey 'n/a'. I doubt there is much that can be done however. If you have better information and the compiler we could take a look!
Unfortunately, I don't have the compiler. Maybe somebody who runs the regressions for it could have a look into bjam.log. I was just wondering what it could be that makes cw 8.3 fail (and not vc 6, for example). Stefan
Stefan Slapeta wrote:
Michael Stevens wrote:
It used to give a lot of nasty template errors of the form: # 678: :, value_type> (), cm, e, row_major_tag ()); # Error: ^ # illegal template argument dependent expression
I say 'used to' because the results are now hidden behind the grey 'n/a'. I doubt there is much that can be done however. If you have better information and the compiler we could take a look!
Unfortunately, I don't have the compiler. Maybe somebody who runs the regressions for it could have a look into bjam.log.
I was just wondering what it could be that makes cw 8.3 fail (and not vc 6, for example).
Although not the most recent, the results of my test runs (with the old-style log) are also published at: http://www.boost.org/regression-logs/cs-Win32_RSI.html -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com - 102708583/icq
Rene Rivera wrote:
Although not the most recent, the results of my test runs (with the old-style log) are also published at:
Looks very much like the runtime errors that were fixed for cw 9.3 this week! (Actually, I didn't read any announcement about anything had been fixed but the failures have disappeared.) Seems we should remove the n/a from ublas/cw 8.3 temporarily and see what the regressions show us. I've modified the explicit failures in order to find it out. Aleksey, I hope that's ok for you ;-) Stefan
Stefan Slapeta wrote:
Looks very much like the runtime errors that were fixed for cw 9.3 this week! (Actually, I didn't read any announcement about anything had been fixed but the failures have disappeared.)
Except it still looks shrouded in n/a'ness. But the errors have disappeared as seen in http://www.boost.org/regression-logs/cs-Win32_RSI.html -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com - 102708583/icq
Rene Rivera wrote:
Except it still looks shrouded in n/a'ness. But the errors have disappeared as seen in http://www.boost.org/regression-logs/cs-Win32_RSI.html
Hmmm, that's very strange. I changed it to n/a again immediately after I had seen that all the ublas tests failed on cw 8.3! Anyway, as I could see in cvs, Micheal has now removed the markup. Stefan
participants (4)
-
Michael Stevens -
Rene Rivera -
Stefan Slapeta -
Stefan Slapeta