[concept_check] Failures because of broken Jamfile.v2
These failures <http://tinyurl.com/r6z9t> seem to be because the Jamfile.v2 in the branch has incorrectly defined the tests as link-fail instead of compile-fail. The HEAD version of that Jamfile.v2 is considerably different, and has the seemingly correct compile-fail tests. I would fix this myself but I don't know whether the different set of tests are intentional, or if someone just forgot to merge. -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo
Rene Rivera wrote:
These failures <http://tinyurl.com/r6z9t> seem to be because the Jamfile.v2 in the branch has incorrectly defined the tests as link-fail instead of compile-fail. The HEAD version of that Jamfile.v2 is considerably different, and has the seemingly correct compile-fail tests. I would fix this myself but I don't know whether the different set of tests are intentional, or if someone just forgot to merge.
It looks like somebody forgot to merge, and in addition to that, the XSLT reporting scripts ignored all link-fail tests completely until Jürgen found the problem and Alexey fixed it. Eek! - Volodya
Rene Rivera <grafikrobot@gmail.com> writes:
These failures <http://tinyurl.com/r6z9t> seem to be because the Jamfile.v2 in the branch has incorrectly defined the tests as link-fail instead of compile-fail. The HEAD version of that Jamfile.v2 is considerably different,
The library's been massively revamped on the HEAD. I still need to document it.
and has the seemingly correct compile-fail tests. I would fix this myself but I don't know whether the different set of tests are intentional, or if someone just forgot to merge.
Intentional; the changes weren't ready in time for 1.34 -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
participants (3)
-
David Abrahams -
Rene Rivera -
Vladimir Prus