is it ok to commit this patch?

Please do. Thanks, John.

this works around some issues when compiling boost.atomic with clang-3.4: ../../../boost/atomic/detail/gcc-atomic.hpp:961:64: error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'storage_type' (aka 'boost::atomics::detail::storage128_type') explicit base_atomic(value_type const& v) BOOST_NOEXCEPT : v_(0)

thnx, tim

--- a/boost/config/compiler/clang.hpp +++ b/boost/config/compiler/clang.hpp @@ -39,6 +39,11 @@ // Clang supports "long long" in all compilation modes. #define BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG

+#if defined(__SIZEOF_INT128__) +# define BOOST_HAS_INT128 +#endif + +

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost