compiler confirmance table

Hi, do you know if anyone has a compiler->boost library table of some sort? As I am going through some of the boost libs to get an idea what I can benefit from working in vc6 environment you have to do quite a bit of poking in the docs to figure out if and how much of a given library will compile/work on this platform. It would be nice to have a table like this (just for example) MSVC6 ======= bind - ok function - ok using portable syntax BLL - forget it xyz - runtime problems ... GCC ===== ... of course if there were standardized unit tests for each lib this could be somewhat automated. max. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.

Max Khesin wrote:
Hi, do you know if anyone has a compiler->boost library table of some sort?
http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/ or, if you're primarily interested in win32: http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-win32.html -cd

Carl Daniel wrote:
Max Khesin wrote:
Hi, do you know if anyone has a compiler->boost library table of some sort?
http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/
or, if you're primarily interested in win32:
A significantly more illustrative picture is available -- http://tinyurl.com/jvyc. -- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering

Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
A significantly more illustrative picture is available -- http://tinyurl.com/jvyc.
...but some of the compilers are dated! The results for the old versions of cwp and Intel are not very interesting. Stefan

Stefan Slapeta writes:
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
A significantly more illustrative picture is available -- http://tinyurl.com/jvyc.
...but some of the compilers are dated!
Naturally.
The results for the old versions of cwp and Intel are not very interesting.
Depends for whom. Not everybody upgrades to the latest version of the compiler as soon as it becomes available. Having said that, if you have access to the compilers that you consider "interesting", and are willing to setup and run regression tests for them, it'll be more than welcome! Once we implement merging of regressions reports, it'd be benefitial to have more computational power -- within the same platform, too -- to reduce the turnaround time. -- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering
participants (4)
-
Aleksey Gurtovoy
-
Carl Daniel
-
Max Khesin
-
Stefan Slapeta