[Report] 55 failures on trunk (2007-12-05)

Boost regression test failures Report time: 2007-12-05T15:24:22Z This report lists all regression test failures on release platforms. Detailed report: http://boost.org/regression/trunk/developer/issues.html 55 failures in 13 libraries asio (1) concept_check (1) date_time (2) dynamic_bitset (2) numeric/interval (6) python (7) regex (1) serialization (22) spirit (4) test (3) thread (2) tr1 (1) utility (3) |asio| io_service_select: darwin-4.0.1 |concept_check| where: intel-linux-9.0 |date_time| testtime_serialize_std_config: darwin-4.0.1 testtime_serialize_xml_std_config: darwin-4.0.1 |dynamic_bitset| dyn_bitset_unit_tests3: gcc-4.2.1 gcc-4.2.1 |numeric/interval| mul: darwin-4.0.1 darwin-4.0.1 overflow: darwin-4.0.1 darwin-4.0.1 pi: darwin-4.0.1 darwin-4.0.1 |python| bases: intel-linux-9.0 exec: intel-linux-9.0 exec-dynamic: intel-linux-9.0 import_: intel-linux-9.0 pointee: intel-linux-9.0 pointer_type_id_test: intel-linux-9.0 upcast: intel-linux-9.0 |regex| regex_regress_threaded: darwin-4.0.1 |serialization| test_demo_portable_archive: darwin-4.0.1 test_demo_portable_archive_dll: darwin-4.0.1 test_exported_binary_archive: gcc-4.2.1 gcc-4.2.1 test_exported_binary_archive_dll: gcc-4.2.1 gcc-4.2.1 test_exported_text_archive: gcc-4.2.1 gcc-4.2.1 test_exported_text_archive_dll: gcc-4.2.1 gcc-4.2.1 test_exported_text_warchive: gcc-4.2.1 gcc-4.2.1 test_exported_text_warchive_dll: gcc-4.2.1 gcc-4.2.1 test_exported_xml_archive: gcc-4.2.1 gcc-4.2.1 test_exported_xml_archive_dll: gcc-4.2.1 gcc-4.2.1 test_exported_xml_warchive: gcc-4.2.1 gcc-4.2.1 test_exported_xml_warchive_dll: gcc-4.2.1 gcc-4.2.1 |spirit| file_iterator_tests_debug: darwin-4.0.1 scanner_value_type_tests: gcc-4.2.1 scanner_value_type_tests_debug: gcc-4.2.1 gcc-4.2.1 |test| prg_exec_fail3: gcc-4.2.1 gcc-4.2.1 intel-linux-9.0 |thread| test_mutex_lib: darwin-4.0.1 intel-linux-9.0 |tr1| std_test_bind_header: darwin-4.0.1 |utility| value_init_test: darwin-4.0.1 darwin-4.0.1 darwin-4.0.1

On Dec 5, 2007 9:15 AM, Douglas Gregor <dgregor@osl.iu.edu> wrote:
Boost regression test failures Report time: 2007-12-05T15:24:22Z
This report lists all regression test failures on release platforms.
Detailed report: http://boost.org/regression/trunk/developer/issues.html
55 failures in 13 libraries [snip]
May I just say, this is incredible: From ~200 failures down to 55 failures! Keep up the great work guys! I hope to see 1.35.0 out the door quicker than I can say 'happy new year!' :) -- Dean Michael C. Berris Software Engineer, Friendster, Inc. [http://cplusplus-soup.blogspot.com/] [mikhailberis@gmail.com] [+63 928 7291459] [+1 408 4049523]

Dean Michael Berris wrote:
On Dec 5, 2007 9:15 AM, Douglas Gregor <dgregor@osl.iu.edu> wrote:
Boost regression test failures Report time: 2007-12-05T15:24:22Z
This report lists all regression test failures on release platforms.
Detailed report: http://boost.org/regression/trunk/developer/issues.html
55 failures in 13 libraries [snip]
May I just say, this is incredible: From ~200 failures down to 55 failures!
If we where that good... This blip is because of the partial testing failure yesterday which caused the results to get reset. It will likely creep back up after the rest of the testers update their results. -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo

On Dec 5, 2007 9:33 AM, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot@gmail.com> wrote:
Dean Michael Berris wrote:
On Dec 5, 2007 9:15 AM, Douglas Gregor <dgregor@osl.iu.edu> wrote:
Boost regression test failures Report time: 2007-12-05T15:24:22Z
This report lists all regression test failures on release platforms.
Detailed report: http://boost.org/regression/trunk/developer/issues.html
55 failures in 13 libraries [snip]
May I just say, this is incredible: From ~200 failures down to 55 failures!
If we where that good... This blip is because of the partial testing failure yesterday which caused the results to get reset. It will likely creep back up after the rest of the testers update their results.
Oh, now back to reality for us then. ;) Still looks good though, while it lasted. :D Thanks for the update and heads up! :) -- Dean Michael C. Berris Software Engineer, Friendster, Inc. [http://cplusplus-soup.blogspot.com/] [mikhailberis@gmail.com] [+63 928 7291459] [+1 408 4049523]
participants (3)
-
Dean Michael Berris
-
Douglas Gregor
-
Rene Rivera