Trimming Dependencies (was Boost and exceptions)
On 24 June 2012 01:55, Dave Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com> wrote:
on Sat Jun 23 2012, Daniel James <dnljms-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
That's pretty crazy. Do you know if separating test dependencies would make much of a difference?
They're already separated, along with documentation dependencies. You *really* don't want to see the graph that includes the test dependencies ;-)
OK, I assumed from the dependencies on Test that they were included, but some headers do depend on Test.
on Sun Jun 24 2012, Daniel James <dnljms-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
On 24 June 2012 01:55, Dave Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com> wrote:
on Sat Jun 23 2012, Daniel James <dnljms-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
That's pretty crazy. Do you know if separating test dependencies would make much of a difference?
They're already separated, along with documentation dependencies. You *really* don't want to see the graph that includes the test dependencies ;-)
OK, I assumed from the dependencies on Test that they were included, but some headers do depend on Test.
Yes, that's one of those libraries that has useful header-only parts that could be separated from the parts that require a library binary. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
participants (2)
-
Daniel James -
Dave Abrahams