Re: [boost] Re: Re: Re: [review] hash functions

Hi Peter, ----- Mensaje original ----- De: Peter Dimov <pdimov@mmltd.net> Fecha: Jueves, Marzo 10, 2005 11:51 pm Asunto: Re: [boost] Re: Re: Re: [review] hash functions
JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z wrote:
The idea is that you can alter only some part of the hashing scheme and benefit of the preexisting definitions: [...]
I think I see your point. You want something like this: [...]
will automatically propagate it downwards if one invokes hash_value on vector<vector<vector<int> > >.
Sort of, I think. Your formulation is somewhat more generic in that you pass combiners around where I rely on tag dispatching (the *_impl markers.)
Interesting, but overkill, IMO. ;-)
Can't say the contrary :) I see it as I way to get everybody happy: regular users don't notice the difference and playful ones can easily plug in their superhashing schemes. Anyway. Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
participants (1)
-
JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z