Re: [boost] phoenix::bind

AMDG Peter Dimov wrote:

Eh. How about this one:

lambda(_x, _y)[ let. _z = _x + _y, _z * _z ]

I think that the implicit let will be much less of an issue in a lambda context than it is in Python (or Javascript), though.

Doesn't that imply that _a, _b, ... have to be enumerated in the definition of let? I like to have the possibility of defining new local variable names. In Christ, Steven Watanabe