Markus Schoepflin wrote:
Boris Gubenko wrote:
I'm not sure why you mention spirit in this context, but it works, at least the tests pass with -tlocal (I've replaced -timplicit_local with -tlocal in hp_cxx.jam):
Wave is built upon spirit, if my memory serves me right.
Ok, thanks for the clarification, Markus. Boris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Markus Schöpflin" <markus.schoepflin@comsoft.de> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 8:52 AM Subject: Re: [boost] [wave] Recent check-ins broke wave onTru64/CXX/RC_1_34_0
Boris Gubenko wrote:
Markus Schoepflin wrote:
Boris Gubenko wrote:
Markus, the problem may go away if you compile -tlocal instead of -timplicit_local, but you, probably, would not want to change instantiation mode just for one library. Other parts of boost depend on the control given by -timplicit_local,
I understand. I'm not suggesting tweaking template instantiation mode just for this issue.
I even have no idea if spirit would work with -tlocal.
I'm not sure why you mention spirit in this context, but it works, at least the tests pass with -tlocal (I've replaced -timplicit_local with -tlocal in hp_cxx.jam):
Wave is built upon spirit, if my memory serves me right.
Markus
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost