Re: [boost] [utility/result_of] decltype-based implementation breaking valid code on msvc-10

Eric Niebler wrote:

I suspect the real problem is in a buggy implementation of decltype on msvc-10. For the upcoming boost release, I suggest that we stick with the non-decltype implementation of result_of on msvc-10, or risk massively breaking users' code, not to mention proto, spirit and xpressive on that compiler.

MSVC10 isn't even released yet. Why bother with a non-stable compiler?