11 Oct
2010
11 Oct
'10
6:49 a.m.
On 11 October 2010 00:01, Emil Dotchevski <emil@revergestudios.com> wrote:
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Daniel Walker <daniel.j.walker@gmail.com> wrote:
Finally, there have been suggestions to alter boost::function's exception safety guarantee directly through either policies or constructor options.
We used to have an Allocator parameter to the boost::function template and it was removed (just in time for this change to also be reflected in C++0x) to reduce coupling.
So what exactly is the proposed behavior if the function object cannot fit in the small object optimization space of unsafe_function and the allocation fails? -- Nevin ":-)" Liber <mailto:nevin@eviloverlord.com> (847) 691-1404