2 Dec
2023
2 Dec
'23
3:55 p.m.
Andrey Semashev wrote:
Interestingly, there seems to be a proposal to add `defer` to C:
Interestingly, the proposed `defer` is literally your BOOST_SCOPE_FINAL, complete with the mandatory [&]. So this is both an argument for retaining the explicit [&] and an argument in favor of renaming it to BOOST_SCOPE_DEFER. It's not clear what are the chances of N2895 in WG14, of course.