[boost] Re: mem_fn warnings

Peter Dimov <pdimov <at> mmltd.net> writes:

I suspect I can do much better in a hypothetical 100% TR1 bind that only targets 100% conforming compilers (and can freely use other TR1 libraries). But what would the point be? Isn't Lambda supposed to fill that role?

Maybe so, but in my recent experiences, even though error messages are bad, bind/mem_fn turns out to be generally *able* to solve the programming problems I encounter, whereas every time I've tried to apply lambda I've dropped it after running into a wall :( -Dave